CookieFirst vs Enzuzo
Which cookie consent tool fits your site best?
The choice between CookieFirst and Enzuzo lets you choose between a platform fixated on speed, or a platform focused on simplifying data rights for e-commerce brands.
Where they are identical
Both platforms are cloud solutions (SaaS) that you add by simply pasting a script on your website. You do not need to be a developer. They both provide automatic cookie scans, script blocking (GDPR and CCPA proof), and feature a built-in generator to draft a privacy or cookie policy for you in just a few steps. Google Consent Mode v2 is also covered out-of-the-box by both.
Where the difference lies
DSAR (Customer Requests) Workflows. Enzuzo (from Canada) heavily designs its solutions with the modern SaaS and Shopify world in mind. In their packages (starting at $9/month), they offer an automated workflow and portal to handle data requests (such as "delete my account and data" or "send my data") from customers. CookieFirst does not have such DSAR workflows.
Speed and Data Location. CookieFirst (the Netherlands) stores all consent logs strictly and exclusively in the European Union. Enzuzo hosts this data in Canada. Furthermore, CookieFirst strongly profiles itself on speed: the company delivers an extremely lightweight script that minimally impacts your Core Web Vitals and load speed.
Cost Structure. CookieFirst (starting at $10/month) is very transparently priced in terms of feature package per domain, and costs will not simply increase with normal use. Enzuzo forces you into more expensive packages as the frequency and complexity of incoming DSAR customer requests increase.
Quick overview
| CookieFirst | Enzuzo | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | from $10/mo | from $9/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU-based | ✓ | ✗ |
| Consent Mode v2 | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature comparison
| Feature | CookieFirst | Enzuzo |
|---|---|---|
| Google Consent Mode v2 Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Cookie Scanning | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic Script/Cookie Blocking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Customizable Consent Banners | ✓ | ✓ |
| IAB TCF 2.2 Support | — | ⚡ Paid |
| Policy Generator (Cookie/Privacy) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Consent Audit Trail / Logs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-hosted Data Processing | ✗ | ✗ |
| CCPA Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Tag Manager Support | ✓ | ✓ |
✓ Included ⚡ Paid plan only ✗ Not available
Platform support
| Platform | CookieFirst | Enzuzo |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shopify | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wix | — | ✓ |
| Squarespace | — | ✓ |
| Webflow | — | ✓ |
| Any HTML/JS Website | ✓ | ✓ |
Based on explicit mentions on the vendor's website.
Our recommendation
For regular B2B websites, agencies, and service providers, we recommend CookieFirst. The fact that the hosting and the party are completely EU-based, combined with the proven lightning-fast load time of the script, is the deciding factor for normal business websites.
Choose Enzuzo if you manage a thriving (international) e-commerce shop, SaaS, or B2C business where streamlining and automating the flow of privacy requests (DSARs) from customers is more than worth the modest additional cost.
Setting up a banner does not equal compliance. Most violations occur post-installation because scripts still load too early via Google Tag Manager. Always run a free scan after configuration to verify it actually works.
Check your own site
Scan your website for free to find cookie consent violations.
Start free scan →