ConsentOS vs Enzuzo
Which cookie consent tool fits your site best?
A comparison between Consentos and Enzuzo clearly illustrates how diverse the market for privacy software is. One provides merely technical building blocks, while the other offers a ready-made platform that ties directly into the operations of webshops.
Where they are identical
At their core, both platforms serve the same purpose: legally covering your website by requesting consent and blocking scripts. With either tool, you can meet the requirements of legislation such as the GDPR (Europe) or CCPA (California). Furthermore, they both operate independently of your CMS, although the installation method requires a different approach.
Where the difference lies
Setup and Functionality. Enzuzo (Canada) is much more than just a cookie banner. It is a cloud-based platform (SaaS) that also offers automatic policy generators and workflows for handling customer privacy requests (DSARs). Consentos is exclusively a banner framework. It is open-source, lacks these advanced workflows, and offers no generators.
Technical Maintenance. You easily roll out Enzuzo via a script. Their cloud servers scan the website and automatically adapt to new trackers. Consentos is a self-hosted solution: there is no external server; you host everything locally. You must categorize the scripts yourself, write the code to block trackers, and you are personally responsible for maintenance.
Data Streams. Enzuzo processes data on their cloud servers outside the European Union (in Canada). While this is legally covered by an adequacy decision, some companies prefer a stricter approach. With Consentos, all consent data remains 100% locally on your own servers.
Quick overview
| ConsentOS | Enzuzo | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Self-hosted (free) | from $9/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU-based | ✓ | ✗ |
| Consent Mode v2 | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature comparison
| Feature | ConsentOS | Enzuzo |
|---|---|---|
| Google Consent Mode v2 Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Cookie Scanning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Automatic Script/Cookie Blocking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Customizable Consent Banners | ✓ | ✓ |
| IAB TCF 2.2 Support | ✓ | ⚡ Paid |
| Policy Generator (Cookie/Privacy) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consent Audit Trail / Logs | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted Data Processing | ✓ | ✗ |
| CCPA Support | — | ✓ |
| Google Tag Manager Support | ✓ | ✓ |
✓ Included ⚡ Paid plan only ✗ Not available
Platform support
| Platform | ConsentOS | Enzuzo |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | — | ✓ |
| Shopify | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wix | — | ✓ |
| Squarespace | — | ✓ |
| Webflow | — | ✓ |
| Any HTML/JS Website | ✓ | ✓ |
Based on explicit mentions on the vendor's website.
Our recommendation
For e-commerce brands and modern SMEs, we recommend Enzuzo. The addition of automated workflows for privacy requests (DSARs) and policy generators makes it a much broader, more robust total solution for your compliance.
Choose Consentos exclusively if you work for a tech-driven company that demands 100% independence from commercial cloud providers, and you are willing to invest in developer hours to build the complex infrastructure in-house.
Setting up a banner does not equal compliance. Most violations occur post-installation because scripts still load too early via Google Tag Manager. Always run a free scan after configuration to verify it actually works.
Check your own site
Scan your website for free to find cookie consent violations.
Start free scan →