ConsentOS vs CookieFirst
Which cookie consent tool fits your site best?
The decision between Consentos and CookieFirst is about the fundamental question: do you want complete independence and build it yourself, or would you rather pay for convenience, automation, and speed via the cloud?
Where they are identical
Both platforms offer the technology to legally ask visitors for consent to place tracking cookies, in accordance with the GDPR and CCPA. In both cases, this is a platform-independent solution that you can add to any given website or webshop, without being tied to one specific CMS (like WordPress or Shopify).
Where the difference lies
Installation and Automation. CookieFirst is a user-friendly Consent Management Platform (CMP). As soon as you create an account, the system scans your website, categorizes the cookies, and assembles an automatic banner. Consentos does not offer this luxury. It is an open-source framework without an automatic scanner. Your web developer must manually dive into the source code to write the logic that determines which script can be loaded when.
Cloud vs Local. CookieFirst is a Dutch SaaS company. The consent proofs are securely stored on their European cloud servers. Consentos requires you to install and host the system yourself (self-hosted). This is considerably more work, but it guarantees that 100% of the data remains on your own local systems.
Features and Price. CookieFirst is a paid service (starting at $10/month, seamlessly predictable) but provides handy extras in return, such as an automatic generator for your privacy and cookie policy. Consentos is free to acquire, lacks a policy generator, and only costs you money in the form of development hours.
Quick overview
| ConsentOS | CookieFirst | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Self-hosted (free) | from $10/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| EU-based | ✓ | ✓ |
| Consent Mode v2 | ✓ | ✓ |
Feature comparison
| Feature | ConsentOS | CookieFirst |
|---|---|---|
| Google Consent Mode v2 Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automated Cookie Scanning | ✗ | ✓ |
| Automatic Script/Cookie Blocking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Customizable Consent Banners | ✓ | ✓ |
| IAB TCF 2.2 Support | ✓ | — |
| Policy Generator (Cookie/Privacy) | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consent Audit Trail / Logs | — | ✓ |
| Self-hosted Data Processing | ✓ | ✗ |
| CCPA Support | — | ✓ |
| Google Tag Manager Support | ✓ | ✓ |
✓ Included ⚡ Paid plan only ✗ Not available
Platform support
| Platform | ConsentOS | CookieFirst |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | — | ✓ |
| Shopify | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wix | — | — |
| Squarespace | — | — |
| Webflow | — | — |
| Any HTML/JS Website | ✓ | ✓ |
Based on explicit mentions on the vendor's website.
Our recommendation
For SMEs, webshops, and agencies, we recommend CookieFirst. The automatic scanner and the addition of a policy generator simply save you a multiple of the subscription costs in technical development time.
Choose Consentos exclusively if you operate from a technical development team with a strong vision for "self-hosted" software, do not want to risk data streams to third parties, and do not shy away from manual coding.
Setting up a banner does not equal compliance. Most violations occur post-installation because scripts still load too early via Google Tag Manager. Always run a free scan after configuration to verify it actually works.
Check your own site
Scan your website for free to find cookie consent violations.
Start free scan →